About constraints, CFE Pistol is neither an exceptionally quickly or sluggish burning pistol powder, so in some cartridges it’s not as well matched for pretty light-weight loads or magnum loads calling for major prices of slow burning powders. Its tiny size also causes it to be easy to accidentally overcharge in particular cartridges.
I've checked velocity improvements associated with diverse primer makes, and conventional compared to magnum. The difference could vary
One particular is actually a JHP and the opposite a LSWC. The length in the bullet will not be the exact same, but I have never witnessed the powder demand for guide bullets greater than Individuals for a similar pounds jacketed bullet. Danny
I went into the Hodgdon Web site and pulled up their data on These loads. Down below is a monitor shot of that facts: What am I lacking? Danny
Other elements contain distinctive bullets, a unique COL, a different great deal amount of powder, distinct primers and distinct brass. Consequently, the problem will not be much no matter if my final results match the revealed effects, but in its place is whether or not my effects display that CFE Pistol offers substantial velocity functionality on the whole. The general effects (proven during the tables) advise that it does.
Yesterday I was astonished when organising for reloading how tiny TG is used (Lymna's pistol handbook). It will be fascinating to discover when there is a smoke issue...cannot be as substantial as in the black powder times lol! I am using the "new" Precisions as well. Many thanks yet again!! Url to remark
Include to quote Only show this user #8 · Mar 24, 2022 Any of All those loads will work, begin reduced and perform your way up until you obtain the specified load no matter whether or not it's accuracy felt recoil chron/ quickly gradual, I like check here CFE and have employed loads of it meters effectively and cleanse at higher velocities.
Some situations exhibit noticeably thick walls, which is usually not a dilemma when working with light here and conventional body weight (nearly 124-grain) bullets; however, when seating the comparatively very long 147-grain bullets, they could potentially cause the situation to bulge at the bottom of the bullet, leading to the cartridge being outside of spec – and infrequently will not likely chamber.
It is actually frequent for handloaders to use data produced for any provided jacketed bullet, but substituted by using a bullet from An additional manufacturer that is of the identical excess weight. This exercise will nearly always end in adjustments in velocities and pressure.
Inspite of this remaining the same powder charge as over, the extra bodyweight offers a way more total burn up. This load cycles very well inside of a Les Baer 1911 with the 18lb spring, has realistic flash and smoke. It's not a bad load in the slightest degree.
In a single take a look at, bullets had been seated to a regular industry General size with powder charges recognized for a load that was inside of pressure recommendations. The exact same bullet was then seated just .040-inch further without other adjustments to the load, and resulted in a very six,000 psi pressure boost – an overload!
Superior-excellent guns feed a range of bullet profiles without the need of incident. The .forty five ACP has also develop into well-known in more modern day pistol patterns (make sure you Notice that I did not say “better”) that in many cases are of polymer construction. These models are commonly very reliable and feed cartridges with various bullet profiles when loaded to appropriate specifications.
They can be tender direct, but have a hard outer shell on them. When loading plated bullets we have found very best success utilizing reduced- to mid-range jacketed data during the load manual. You must use data for your bullet which has the identical fat and profile as being the a single you will be loading. Usually do not exceed mid-range loads. Do not use magnum loads."
The Speer was printed in advance of CFE’s existence. I are already applying online assets for my comparisons and that is why I went into the Hodgdon Internet site. And that's if the confusion commenced... I am likely to find out if I am able to Speak to Hodgdon to obtain a clarification. Wish me luck! Thanks once again! Danny